Distinct browser sessions that opened the instrument.
Public impact record / measured conservatively
Reach is visible.
Impact must be earned.
EPSILON separates anonymous product activity from independently reviewable contribution. A page view is reach. A completed evidence field is use. A substantive external challenge is impact only after it remains publicly inspectable.
Deduplicated machine-readable artifacts generated.
Evidence files downloaded for inspection or reuse.
Sessions that continued to the external review channel.
Evidence hierarchy
Not every number means the same thing.
- 01 / Reach
Someone encountered the work.
Visits, impressions, and video views are useful distribution diagnostics. They are not counted as adoption or educational impact.
- 02 / Use
Someone completed a research action.
Opening the laboratory, completing an evidence field, and exporting an artifact are measured as distinct anonymous actions.
- 03 / External challenge
Someone tested the method itself.
A review counts only when a real person identifies a specific assumption, evidence gap, interpretation risk, or product weakness in a publicly linkable record.
- 04 / Change
The criticism altered the work.
Accepted challenges link to the resulting experiment, issue, correction, or product change. Unfavorable findings remain visible.
Falsification challenge / open
Find the assumption
we failed to expose.
The most valuable contribution is not praise. Run one evidence field, identify one weakness, and leave a challenge another person can inspect.
No purchased traffic · no coordinated votes · no investment claims · no personal data collected · session identifiers are temporary and anonymous.